by Catilin D. Cottril, URISA Journal 2011, Volume 23, Issue 2
For full text of the article, click here.
- Protecting Location Privacy Against Inference Attacks (geodatapolicy.wordpress.com)
- Monday’s Musings: Seven Basic Privacy Rights Users Should Demand For Social Business (forbes.com)
By Tanzina Vega, NYT, August 14, 2011
For many Internet users, online privacy policies are long and difficult to read. Transfer those same policies to a mobile device, where users can find themselves clicking through multiple screens often with tiny type, and the policies can become almost useless to the average consumer.Yet those same policies govern how much user data is collected through mobile applications and how that data is shared with advertisers and other third parties. And with growing concern over data collection, including proposed legislation to more closely protect consumers, one company is trying to make privacy policies that are both easy for consumers to read and easy for mobile application developers to create. …
For full text of the article, visit Industry Tinkers to Create Privacy Tools for Mobile Devices – NYTimes.com.
- Industry Tries to Streamline Privacy Policies for Mobile Users (nytimes.com)
- Media Decoder Blog: In a First, F.T.C. Settles With App Developer Over Children’s Privacy (mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com)
- App-maker fined over kids’ privacy (politico.com)
- Apps Maker Settles Privacy Case (online.wsj.com)
Privacy in Europe and the United States: I Know It When I See It | Center for Democracy & Technology
by Omer Tene, Center for Democracy and Technology Website, June 27, 2011
This post is part of “CDT Fellows Focus,” a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. This week, CDT Fellow Omer Tene is our guest contributor. Posts featured in “CDT Fellows Focus” don’t necessarily reflect the views of CDT; the goal of the series is to present diverse, well-informed views on significant tech policy issues.
There is a great deal of cross-Atlantic harmony with respect to fundamental legal concepts. A contract is a contract in both the United States and France; it is formed by offer and acceptance, and awards specific performance or damages upon breach. Likewise, a tort is a breach of a civil duty; and a corporation a distinct legal entity. Yet when it comes to privacy, the cross-Atlantic harmony breaks down. While the psychological need for and social value of privacy are universal, legal and societal privacy norms diverge to the extent that we must ask whether we are speaking about the same thing. …
For full text of the article visit Privacy in Europe and the United States: I Know It When I See It | Center for Democracy & Technology.
by Kevin D. Pomfret, LeClairRyan, Executive Counsel Magazine, April/May 2011
Geolocation technology enables devices like smart phones to collect data “about where people go and what they do,” the author explains. “This information can be aggregated with other information to determine ‘who they are’ with precision and accuracy.” Geolocation technology raises concerns in part because significant benefits of the technology often are overshadowed by sensationalized media accounts of real or perceived privacy breeches, according to the author.
For full text of the summary, visit Executive Counsel » Lawmakers Eye Geolocation Apps. For full text of the article, you will need to subscribe to Executive Counsel or purchase this month’s magazine.
- The Future of Social Networks and Geolocation (geodatapolicy.wordpress.com)
- Creepy Shows Just How Much Geolocation Data You Broadcast Online (makeuseof.com)
- Jim Steyer: Why We Need “Do Not Track Kids” (huffingtonpost.com)
- New Bill Would Update Digital Privacy Law (blogs.wsj.com)
Our data, ourselves: What if privacy is keeping us from reaping the real benefits of the infosphere?
By Leon Neyfakh, Boston Globe, May 22, 2011
… Taken together, the information that millions of us are generating about ourselves amounts to a data set of unimaginable size and growing complexity … Up to now, the public conversation on this kind of data has taken the form of an argument about privacy rights, with legal scholars, computer scientists, and others arguing for tighter restrictions on how our data is used by companies and the government, and consumer advocates instructing us on how to prevent our information from being collected and misused. But a small group of thinkers is suggesting an entirely new way of understanding our relationship with the data we generate. Instead of arguing about ownership and the right to privacy, they say, we should be imagining data as a public resource: a bountiful trove of information about our society which, if properly managed and cared for, can help us set better policy, more effectively run our institutions, promote public health, and generally give us a more accurate understanding of who we are. This growing pool of data should be public and anonymous, they say — and each of us should feel a civic responsibility to contribute to it. …
For full text of the article, visit Our data, ourselves – The Boston Globe.
- FCC steps into privacy debate over location-based data, announcing forum (geodatapolicy.wordpress.com)
- IBM to invest $100 million for big-data analysis research (infoworld.com)
- The Privacy Challenge in Online Prize Contests (bits.blogs.nytimes.com)
Congressional Research Service Report: Privacy Protections for Personal Information Online
Summary: There is no comprehensive federal privacy statute that protects personal information. Instead, a patchwork of federal laws and regulations govern the collection and disclosure of personal information and has been addressed by Congress on a sector-by-sector basis. Federal laws and regulations extend protection to consumer credit reports, electronic communications, federal agency records, education records, bank records, cable subscriber information, video rental records, motor vehicle records, health information, telecommunications subscriber information, children’s online information, and customer financial information. Some contend that this patchwork of laws and regulations is insufficient to meet the demands of today’s technology. Congress, the Obama Administration, businesses, public interest groups, and citizens are all involved in the discussion of privacy solutions. This report examines some of those efforts with respect to the protection of personal information. This report provides a brief overview of selected recent developments in the area of federal privacy law. This report does not cover workplace privacy laws or state privacy laws.
For a copy of this report, see CRS Report R41756, Privacy Protections for Personal Information Online, by Gina Stevens, April 6, 2011.
For information on access to electronic communications, see CRS Report R41733, Privacy: An Overview of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, by Charles Doyle.
- “Kerry-McCain Senate Bill Introduced to Protect Consumer Internet Privacy” and related posts (mybanktracker.com)
- MySpace Sued Over Privacy Loophole (blogs.wsj.com)
- Privacy Protective Android App Developed (infosecurity.us)
- Well-Meaning “Privacy Bill of Rights” Wouldn’t Stop Online Tracking (eff.org)
- Privacy dispute tests Obama’s earlier promises (news.cnet.com)
- The FTC And The Future Of Privacy Enforcement In America (businessinsider.com)
- Schwartz On Security: Online Privacy Battles Advertising Profits (informationweek.com)
- Europe Moves to Give Consumers Control of Online Advertising (pcworld.com)
- Online Advertisers Pitch Self-Regulation Framework (informationweek.com)