Notes in a Nutshell: Social Media #Policy Break-out Sessions at #SMEM11
At the NEMA annual conference in Washington, D.C. today, emergency managers from around the country participated in the Social Media 4 Emergency Management 2011 camp (hastag #SMEM11) to learn how they might integrate social media tools like Twitter and Facebook into their operational planning and response activities. Kim Stevens moderated three break-out sessions wherin particpants discussed policy challenges to using these technologies for emergency response. Some of the issues discussed include:
Who within an organization may access and use social media tools? Organizations typically fail to leverage the full power of these tools, using them for public information campaigns but not for interactive intelligence gathering. Participants emphasized the need to have an active feedback loop beween the Public Information Officer, Planning office, the Incident Commander / EOC, and Operations.
What is the government liablity for taking action based on user-generated content (if the information is incorrect)? Local authorities can absorb user-generated content, but analysis, integration with authoritative data, use, and dissemination may have legal implications. Authorities expressed concern about being sued if they take action or put out a message based on incorrect user-generated data.
What is civilian liability for contributing incorrect information? Participants noted a handful of examples of misuse.
In some instances, agencies have the competing constructs of emergency management and homeland security; needless to say cybersecurity is an important issue.
What are the ethical and best practice guidelines for staff use of social media both at work and at home (as it may impact the employer)?
What are the privacy issues if you let Emergency Management follow you on twitter? One participant described it as the “spectrum of discomfort”: Are you comfortable if they use your tweets in a crisis? Yes. Are you comfortable if they use your tweets when there’s an incident in the Starbucks? Maybe. Are you comfortable if they monitor your tweets, and perhaps share them with other agencies, on a regular basis? Maybe not.
Is there a privacy infringement if other citizens tweets about you and share your location?
Is a tweet submitted to a county Emergency Management agency considered a record under state open records law? One participant said that in her state it is considered a “record” and is treated just like a 911 call, which raises other legal and ethical questions about archiving, preservation and access. These tweets may be shared with multiple agencies, such as health, DOT and the utility companies. Another participant noted that in his state, this information is exempt from disclosure if used for operational and contingency planning.
Under the Digital Communications Accessibility Act of 2010, how is the government going to ensure that communication channels have accessibility features and what requirements will be imposed? Twitter and Facebook are both compliant with third party software. But, social media may provide a better way to connect, e.g., smart phones don’t require a TTY for the hearing impaired.
Representation / Digital Divide:
Who is contributing information via social media tools? One academic study indicated that the majority of contributors to Open Street Maps in certain areas is mostly men under 35. A participant working with All Humanity raised digital divide issues, while another noted that social media usage will expand over time to be more inclusive. When using user-generated content, care should be taken to ensure that potential age, gender, education, economic, geographic, and other potential biases are taken into account.
Participants also discussed data ownership, terms of service, indeminfication, and national security issues.
Participants noted that the reluctance of emergency managers to use social media stems from: (1) lack of understanding and awareness; (2) perceived threat due to the speed of the media as need to publish information within minutes rather than hours; (3) fear of interactive dialogue; (4) lack of staffing support to conduct a social media dialogue during a crisis; and (5) fear of putting out incorrect information and not being able to retract it.
Opportunities for Moving Forward:
Kim Stevens has written a nice synthesis of the day’s discussions and put together a great bibilography on social media for crisis response and the related policy issues for her blog iDisaster.
Also keep an eye out for the forthcoming white paper on this workshop from www.CrisisCommons.org.
- SMEM chat: Discussing our “Cloud based Collective” (idisaster.wordpress.com)
- Speaking at the National Emergency Management Conference (decisionsforheroes.com)
- Social Media and Emergency Management: Chatting Away (idisaster.wordpress.com)
Tags: Business, Crisis Response, CrisisCommons, DHS, Emergency Management, Ethics, Facebook, FEMA, Fugate, Intellectual Property, Kim Stevens, Liability, National Security, Online Communities, Privacy and Security, Public Information Officer, Public Policy and Regulation, Social media, Twitter, United States
Dr. Lea Shanley is the founder and former co-Chair of the Federal Community of Practice on Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science, a vibrant community of 200 federal employees from more than 35 agencies. She is also a co-founding member of the Citizen Science Association. Dr. Shanley recently served as a Presidential Innovation Fellow at NASA, where she helped to foster a culture of open innovation. Prior to this, she founded and directed the Commons Lab at the Wilson Center, served in the US Senate as a Congressional Science Fellow, and worked with local and tribal communities to develop GIS-based decision support systems for city planning, natural resource management, coastal management, and disaster response through the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Disclaimer: This is a personal blog of links to relevant news, events, and reports, provided for educational purposes only. The opinions and views contained therein are those only of the authors of the original articles. These opinions do not necessarily reflect those of the editor of this blog or or associated organizations.
- AAAS Science Tech Congress
- AIP Bulletin of Science Policy News
- All Points Blog
- Ars Technica Law & Disorder
- Electronic Discovery Law
- Ethical Guidance for Pervasive and Autonomous IT
- GEOIDE Data Quality & Legal Research
- Geospatial One-Stop
- GSDI Legal Econ Forum
- Kevin Pomfret's Spatial Law
- Lawrence Lessig's Blog
- NSGIC Blog
- Ogle Earth
- PPGIS Blog
- Res Communis
- SDI Magazine's Policy Page
- Solove's Concurring Opinions
- Teresa Scassa Blog
- Wilson Center's Commons Lab Blog
- Building a Business Case for Shared Geospatial Data and Services
- Geographer’s Craft Legal Issues in GIS
- GIS: Mastering the Legal Issues
- Harlan Onsrud’s GIS Law
- Legal Issues in the Use of GIS for Agriculture and Natural Resource Management
- NRC Licensing Geographic Data and Services
- NRC National Land Parcel Data
- NSGIC Strategic and Business Plan Temmplates
- SDI Magazine's Policy Page
Societies & Agencies
- AAAS Science Policy Programs
- Aboriginal Mapping Network
- America View
- Center for Technology in Government
- CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information
- CrisisMappers Network
- Digital Government Society
- GDSI Association
- Group on Earth Observation
- Harvard Belfer Center
- Indigenous Mapping Network
- Institute on Governance
- Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium
- National Center for Digital Government
- National Center for Remote Sensing Air and Space Law
- National Conference of State Legislatures
- NCGIA UCSB
- Open Street Map
- PPGIS Blog
- The National Map (US)
- U.S. National Geospatial Advisory Council
- US Census Bureau
- USGS National Geospatial Program
- Wilson Center's Science and Technology Innovation Program
- 144,341 hits
Trackbacks / Pingbacks