Department of Homeland Security Contractor Monitored Social Networking Sites
Federal Contractor Monitored Social Network Sites, By Charlie Savage, New York Times, January 13, 2012
The Department of Homeland Security paid a contractor in 2009 to monitor social networking sites — like Facebook, blogs and reader comments on a news article — to see how the residents of Standish, Mich., were reacting to a proposal to move detainees from Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to a local prison there, according to newly disclosed documents. While it has long been known that the department monitors the Internet for information about emerging threats to public safety like a natural disaster or a terrorist attack, the documents show that its Social Networking/Media Capability program, at least in an early stage, was also focused on “public reaction to major governmental proposals with homeland security implications.” A department official said Friday that the social network monitoring program did not produce reports about public opinion, but instead focused exclusively on monitoring crises like hazardous material spills, shooting incidents and natural disasters. …
For full text of this article, Federal Contractor Monitored Social Network Sites – NYTimes.com.
How can DHS effectively use social media for rapid situational awareness to improve crisis response, while at the same time minimize the potential impact on privacy and first amendment rights? What do you think is the appropriate balance?
Related articles
- Homeland Security Dept. monitored social sites for public reaction (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- What Does Homeland Security Read? (bits.blogs.nytimes.com)
- DHS Monitors Social Media For ‘Political Dissent’ (news.slashdot.org)
- EPIC – FOIA Documents Reveal Homeland Security is Monitoring Political Dissent (bespacific.com)
4 Responses to “Department of Homeland Security Contractor Monitored Social Networking Sites”
Trackbacks / Pingbacks
- - January 19, 2012
- - January 21, 2012
- - February 1, 2012

If one is posting to a publicly accessible web site isn’t this exactly what we want our government to do – listen to the concerns of the citizens?